On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 12:42, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I guess the question that comes to mind for me is how many other
> things fall into this category. We define a lot of symbols like int4
> and int32 that other people could also have defined, and I don't
> really want to s/^/pg/ all of them. If it's really only a question of
> renaming bool I could see doing it.
You mean i'd get the pleasure of 'fixing' all my 3rd party C modules?
Not that that is a huge problem, we have broken calling conventions in
most releases...