Re: Bitmask trickiness

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Howard Rogers <hjr(at)diznix(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bitmask trickiness
Date: 2010-07-22 03:03:25
Message-ID: AANLkTilD1GYs0E4UVY0m30LOmGXXFpyW5_ffJOUb7krV@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 9:02 PM, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If the fifth bit means one thing, and the 7th bit means something
> else, quick which of the following have the fifth bit set and the 7th
> bit off:

That should be fifth bit off and 7th bit on up there ^^^

>
> 01001101 (base2)
> or
> 77 (base 10)

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Howard Rogers 2010-07-22 04:13:19 Re: Bitmask trickiness
Previous Message Scott Marlowe 2010-07-22 03:02:19 Re: Bitmask trickiness