Re: Partial indexes instead of partitions

From: David Wilson <david(dot)t(dot)wilson(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Hunsberger <peter(dot)hunsberger(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Leonardo F <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>, Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partial indexes instead of partitions
Date: 2010-06-14 12:53:06
Message-ID: AANLkTilByJyLgwXY7BLfLR8xv23MSb4TXCzjdlcW4emK@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Peter Hunsberger <
peter(dot)hunsberger(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

>
>
> Can you define acceptable? IIRC the OP is looking for 20,000+ inserts /
> sec.
>
>
> He's actually only looking for 2k inserts/sec. With a battery backed
controller I can sustain that, yes. That's also on commodity hardware (the
whole system was under $2k a year and a half ago).

--
- David T. Wilson
david(dot)t(dot)wilson(at)gmail(dot)com

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alban Hertroys 2010-06-14 13:01:07 Re: Is there a way to backup Postgres via SQL commands?
Previous Message Peter Hunsberger 2010-06-14 12:38:27 Re: Partial indexes instead of partitions