Re: BUG #5520: PG unable to find java stored procs without input parameters

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Mengaziol <pmengaziol(at)electrainfo(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #5520: PG unable to find java stored procs without input parameters
Date: 2010-06-29 16:11:40
Message-ID: AANLkTil9Fdtj65XEMpp06B-EUiEsa9A4FeFit7leSgKj@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Peter Mengaziol
<pmengaziol(at)electrainfo(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The following bug has been logged online:
>
> Bug reference:      5520
> Logged by:          Peter Mengaziol
> Email address:      pmengaziol(at)electrainfo(dot)com
> PostgreSQL version: 8.4.4
> Operating system:   OS X 10.4.13
> Description:        PG unable to find java stored procs without input
> parameters
> Details:
>
> Under PG 8.4.1 and pl/java 1.4.0 have been unable to get a jsproc to be
> registered and found when there is not a single input parameter. The same
> code with a dummy input parameter is found and executed sucessfully.

Since there's been no response here you might want to try the JDBC mailing list:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-jdbc/

You might also want to provide some more details, like a complete test
case that you think should work but doesn't.

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Guide_to_reporting_problems

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kris Jurka 2010-06-29 16:59:22 Re: [JDBC] JDBC: 2 bugs: Getting a smallint array actually gets an integer array and return type of a boolean array is bit.
Previous Message Marcel Asio 2010-06-29 15:44:09 Re: Function works in 8.4 but not in 9.0 beta2 "ERROR: structure of query does not match function result type"