From: | Brent DeSpain <bd(dot)postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrej <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Extending Regular Expression bounds limit of 255. |
Date: | 2010-05-27 22:44:00 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTil49TqqzY3yQQFU-gGNT4KaVUjz1o5QHQGcYLZg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
No. Strangely enough they don't in enforce this limit.
Brent DeSpain
Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc.
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 2:59 PM, Andrej <andrej(dot)groups(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On 28 May 2010 07:33, Brent DeSpain <bd(dot)postgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > In the docs
> >
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/interactive/functions-matching.html#POSIX-EMBEDDED-OPTIONS-TABLE
> > it says that Regular Expression bounds {m,n} that m and n can be 0-255.
> Is
> > there a way to extend the upper limit. We are trying to be consistent
> > between Regular Expressionimplementation an the other implementations do
> not
> > have this limit.
> Interesting. The POSIX standard for REs dictates this limit; which
> implementations
> you're using don't adhere to it?
>
>
> Cheers,
> Andrej
>
>
>
>
> --
> Please don't top post, and don't use HTML e-Mail :} Make your quotes
> concise.
>
> http://www.american.edu/econ/notes/htmlmail.htm
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Brent DeSpain | 2010-05-27 22:55:55 | Re: Extending Regular Expression bounds limit of 255. |
Previous Message | Andrej | 2010-05-27 20:59:04 | Re: Extending Regular Expression bounds limit of 255. |