Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Row-level Locks & SERIALIZABLE transactions, postgres vs. Oracle
Date: 2010-05-19 04:07:59
Message-ID: AANLkTikzpg8eAkudoD3okhxN0F6pcs_jS_xouPMzb3wO@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> wrote:
> Will do. Thanks for the link.
>
> Here is an updated version that works for SHARE locks too.
>
> (This message mainly serves as a way to link the updated patch to the commit fest entry. Is this how I'm supposed to do that, or am I doing something wrong?)

Yeah - just go to the existing CF entry and say "New Comment" then
select type "Patch".

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-05-19 04:20:51 Re: ecmascript 5 DATESTYLE
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-05-19 03:59:53 Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)