From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: recovery getting interrupted is not so unusual as it used to be |
Date: | 2010-05-25 16:38:07 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikxvfQiCPPtxqqWXbjybrQmcQtrGGqWpSPspLbd@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-25 at 19:12 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
>> On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 5:33 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> > On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 3:20 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> >> Hmm, OK, I think that makes sense. Would you care to propose a patch?
>> >
>> > Yep. Here is the patch.
>> >
>> > This patch distinguishes normal shutdown from unexpected exit, while the
>> > server is in recovery. That is, when smart or fast shutdown is requested
>> > during recovery, the bgwriter sets the ControlFile->state to new-introduced
>> > DB_SHUTDOWNED_IN_RECOVERY state.
>>
>> This patch is worth applying for 9.0? If not, I'll add it into
>> the next CF for 9.1.
>
> Presumably Robert will be applying the patch? It seems to address the
> concern raised on the thread.
Yes, I was planning to review it. But if you or someone else would
like to cut in, that's OK too.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-05-25 16:40:59 | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-05-25 16:36:42 | Re: recovery getting interrupted is not so unusual as it used to be |