Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Fix for Index Advisor related hooks
Date: 2011-02-17 00:39:50
Message-ID: AANLkTiktOSHDM3iQrt5kv3oYxfukx_d2emoMZky6yD=-@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 16 February 2011 23:02, Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>
>> Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> >     BTW, you use the term 'fictitious' in the comments, would it be
>> > better
>> > to standardize the term used for such an index? So either the comment
>> > would
>> > be changed to call it hypothetical, or the structure member would be
>> > changed
>> > to isfictitious.
>>
>> Yeah, hypothetical is the more-established term I think.
>
> Please find the patch attached.

For my benefit, could you explain how ishypothetical gets set to true?

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-17 00:42:50 Re: Add support for logging the current role
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-17 00:39:12 Re: Debian readline/libedit breakage