Re: comment needs to be updated for HS?

On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 4:20 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> postmaster.c contains the following comment just above the definition
>> of PMState.  It appears to be out of date:
>>
>>  * After reaching a consistent point in WAL redo, startup process signals
>>  * us again, and we switch to PM_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT state. There's currently
>>  * no difference between PM_RECOVERY and PM_RECOVERY_CONSISTENT, but we
>>  * could start accepting connections to perform read-only queries at this
>>  * point, if we had the infrastructure to do that.
>
> But the first sentence of the above seems to be correct and helpful. No?

Yes. I was just quoting the whole thing for context.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company