Re: serializable lock consistency

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: serializable lock consistency
Date: 2010-12-20 17:54:20
Message-ID: AANLkTikgFb5+7FcYEnfFocLL96PdwDP3aTuBd-aWYbKb@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 12:49 PM, Florian Pflug <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org> wrote:
> For me, this is another very good reason to explore this further. Plus, it
> improves the ratio of grotty-ness vs. number-of-problems-soved ;-)

By all means, look into it further. I fear the boat is filling up
with water, but if you manage to come up with a workable solution I'll
be as happy as anyone, promise!

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-12-20 18:06:43 Re: relaxing sync commit if no WAL written (was Re: unlogged tables)
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2010-12-20 17:54:11 Re: pg_ctl and port number detection