Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints
Date: 2010-06-09 02:00:41
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Takahiro Itagaki
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> >> I prefer archive_cleanup_command. We should name things after their
>> >> principal function, not an implementation detail, IMNSHO.
>> >
>> > Weak preference for archive_cleanup_command here.
>> OK, sounds like we have consensus on that.  Who wants to do it?
> Do we just need to replace all of them? If so, patch attached.
> I replaced 3 terms: recovery_end_command, recovery-end-command,
> and recoveryEndCommand.


I prefer restartpoint_command over archive_cleanup_command because
not only restartpoint_command but also recovery_end_command is used
for archive cleanup.


Fujii Masao
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Fujii MasaoDate: 2010-06-09 02:15:33
Subject: Re: SR slaves and .pgpass
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-06-09 01:51:59
Subject: Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group