Re: Command to prune archive at restartpoints

On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Takahiro Itagaki
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 6:45 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> >> I prefer archive_cleanup_command. We should name things after their
>> >> principal function, not an implementation detail, IMNSHO.
>> >
>> > Weak preference for archive_cleanup_command here.
>>
>> OK, sounds like we have consensus on that.  Who wants to do it?
>
> Do we just need to replace all of them? If so, patch attached.
> I replaced 3 terms: recovery_end_command, recovery-end-command,
> and recoveryEndCommand.

s/recovery_end_command/restartpoint_command?

I prefer restartpoint_command over archive_cleanup_command because
not only restartpoint_command but also recovery_end_command is used
for archive cleanup.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center