Re: URL alias for License

From: Martin Atukunda <matlads(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: URL alias for License
Date: 2010-12-11 17:17:39
Message-ID: AANLkTikdo_M=6wR26v_LiM2txvg=TkNDyGsB34ZJ6iZ+@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 12:09 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 14:21, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Excerpts from Dave Page's message of mar dic 07 03:43:36 -0300 2010:
>>> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>>> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> > Given that it's so much work to have a redirect, the solution is simple:
>>> > just change the page from licence to license.  Surely no Brit is even
>>> > going to notice.
>>>
>>> I didn't say it was "so much work" (actually, I suggested it was
>>> probably the opposite) - I was arguing that we shouldn't create a
>>> system of redirects to maintain ad-infinitum for zero practical gain.
>>
>> I agree with that general policy, and I furthermore consider this one to
>> be a pretty reasonable exception.
>>
>> I, too, have written the URL by hand only to get a 404.
>
> I've applied a patch that redirects this in the proper place - the one
> Stefan did only redirected it on wwwmaster, which is not where the end
> user will see it...
>

Interestingly the text on the page uses the "License" form

:)

- Martin -

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-12-13 12:35:17 Re: Documentation for "PostgreSQL 9"?
Previous Message Martin Atukunda 2010-12-11 17:15:17 Re: Documentation for "PostgreSQL 9"?