Re: Function for dealing with xlog data

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Function for dealing with xlog data
Date: 2010-12-28 13:46:31
Message-ID: AANLkTikdD777=ThrnhUZXzfTy-aBNNFDWUEpe_1aUZD=@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 14:39, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 7:49 AM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Currently, a number of functions return data in a really
>> calculation-unfriendly format, e.g:
>>
>> postgres=# select * from pg_current_xlog_location();
>>  pg_current_xlog_location
>> --------------------------
>>  0/3013158
>> (1 row)
>>
>> It would be very useful to have a way to convert this to a bigint - so
>> we can do differences between different values easily. And it's AFAIUI
>> easily converted to a 64-bit integer.
>>
>> Would others find this useful as well?
>
> Yes.
>
>> What's the best way of doing it? Should we have a function that takes
>> text as input, or should the functions in question be made to return a
>> new datatype that could then be casted?
>
> The new datatype seems more elegant, but a conversion function would
> be a lot less work.

Well, yeah, that was obvious ;) The question is, how much do we prefer
the more elegant method? ;)

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-12-28 13:57:46 Re: Function for dealing with xlog data
Previous Message tv 2010-12-28 13:41:24 Re: estimating # of distinct values