| From: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Additional index entries and table sorting |
| Date: | 2010-11-05 22:33:17 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikcrUfRB=T4dQNNCbnGKYxLv1XZTwUwAbL0hxqZ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
On 28 October 2010 20:15, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> wrote:
>
> It was already inconsistent in the SGML, but if you wish, I'll redo it so
> that they're all in tables. That will mean taking the sections which kept
> index terms outside of tables already, and merging them with all the tables.
> Will take me a while.
Okay, here's another version, moving index entries back from separate lists
into function tables, although I think I've done that for more than just my
own changes.
--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| doc_index_updates_v2.patch.gz | application/x-gzip | 14.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marti Raudsepp | 2010-11-09 10:21:54 | plpython docs should say 'plpy.Error' instead of ERROR |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-11-04 18:34:12 | Re: Large SGML Cleanup |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Hannu Krosing | 2010-11-05 22:39:01 | Re: Simplifying replication |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-11-05 22:33:03 | Re: [PATCH] Revert default wal_sync_method to fdatasync on Linux 2.6.33+ |