Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Found a Bug in latest Driver (I THINK) and pg 8.4

From: Jason Tesser <jasontesser(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-jdbc <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Found a Bug in latest Driver (I THINK) and pg 8.4
Date: 2010-06-02 10:10:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-jdbc
Well PSQL respects search_path but given your objections before and the fact
that this would be a change I was suggesting that on PG_OBJECT an option be
given to set/getTypeSchema()  This way if not set it functions as it does
now.  No change to current usaage BUT if it is set in the PGOBECT then it
would be respected.

I think this provides a way of handling the case which PSQL does and doesn't
break backwards compatibility.

On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 6:03 AM, Kris Jurka <books(at)ejurka(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Jason Tesser wrote:
>  Right in my case my schema changes as each organization has a separate
>> schema.
>> I would love to be able to set the schema with the typeName.  Why couldn't
>> that be a seperate attribute in Java setLookupSchema and if not set
>> function
>> as it does now. Wouldn't this handle both cases.
> I'm not sure where you are suggesting that this attribute would live.  Are
> you suggesting we should have a PGConnection method setSearchPath(String)
> that would set the search path on the server side and make the driver aware
> of the change?  Are you suggesting that PGObject should have a
> getTypeSchema()?  Can you clarify your suggestion?
> Kris Jurka

In response to

pgsql-jdbc by date

Next:From: Manohar BhattaraiDate: 2010-06-02 13:40:15
Subject: Re: Not able to connect to postgresql database
Previous:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2010-06-02 10:03:30
Subject: Re: Found a Bug in latest Driver (I THINK) and pg 8.4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group