Re: Slow count(*) again...

From: Jon Nelson <jnelson+pgsql(at)jamponi(dot)net>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: mladen(dot)gogala(at)vmsinfo(dot)com, "david(at)lang(dot)hm" <david(at)lang(dot)hm>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, Vitalii Tymchyshyn <tivv00(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Slow count(*) again...
Date: 2010-10-12 13:20:14
Message-ID: AANLkTik_wN6Wn=G5NsxpbnEpaa=kdcAruLn8s0XBimNH@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> No.  Usually the sequence used to remove all cached data from RAM before a
> benchmark is:

All cached data (as cached in postgresql - *not* the Linux system
caches)..., right?

--
Jon

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2010-10-12 13:20:51 Re: security hook on table creation
Previous Message Luca Tettamanti 2010-10-12 13:19:52 Re: Slow count(*) again...

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mladen Gogala 2010-10-12 13:55:39 Re: Slow count(*) again...
Previous Message Luca Tettamanti 2010-10-12 13:19:52 Re: Slow count(*) again...