Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion
Date: 2010-09-17 21:35:27
Message-ID: AANLkTikUafNdxsc+kxw48Q5Xaa58fHuZQ6ud2CoDQzVO@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 23:21, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Actually, the simplest way to handle this might be to just delete all
> five of those tags during the conversion, and then I'll put them back
> in the right places later when I add the other old-release tags.
> That way we won't have any tags getting moved after the repository is
> published.  (Or am I wrong about that being something to avoid?  But
> in any case we want to gc the manufactured commits for Release_2_0_0
> and Release_2_0.)

As long as nobody has cloned the repository, it's not a problem moving
them. But it *is* something you should generally avoid, so let's do
that :-)

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Adams 2010-09-17 21:45:35 Re: patch: Add JSON datatype to PostgreSQL (GSoC, WIP)
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-09-17 21:34:28 Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2010-09-17 22:00:49 Re: error on http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Lock_Monitoring
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-09-17 21:34:28 Re: Report: removing the inconsistencies in our CVS->git conversion