Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: hstore ==> and deprecate =>
Date: 2010-06-18 03:54:00
Message-ID: AANLkTikS_a2wBnVray3irbwsNgBD48kZg87Wd-wvCeFv@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 11:04 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
>>> I vote for % .
>> I'd vote for %>, out of those.  Reason: the operator isn't commutative,
>> in fact left and right inputs aren't even the same datatype, so a glyph
>> that looks asymmetric seems more natural.
> Lots of operators aren't commutative. Arithmetic % for example ;-)

I've committed this as % -- if anyone cares about it enough to keep
arguing, we can change it again.

> I think this bikeshed is going to be more paint than shed.

You said it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Ng 2010-06-18 06:54:24 Re: to enable O_DIRECT within postgresql
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-06-18 03:09:02 Re: modular se-pgsql as proof-of-concept