Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta
Date: 2010-05-19 15:07:59
Message-ID: AANLkTikNHEvcbTJiVwNk-AFyG9SbCNcpUCr-lyPk8X4o@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 11:06 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com> wrote:
>
>>> given how much faster the new format is (or rather how slow the old one
>>> was) and the number of people I have seen complaining "why is bytea so
>>> slow) I would like to see it staying turned on by default. However this
>>> also depends on how quickly database driver developers can adapt.
>
> DBD::Pg is already patched, and will very likely be released before 9.0

How do the distros generaly deal with that? E.g. do we have to wait
for RHEL7 for it to actually show up in redhat?

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-05-19 15:11:31 Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2010-05-19 15:06:37 Re: BYTEA / DBD::Pg change in 9.0 beta