From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: host name support in pg_hba.conf |
Date: | 2010-10-06 13:44:26 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTikMt-pJeZfb3QpcRPNug929YAvEFFtegFTUwBw3@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 15:34, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 15:16, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> However, the usage in pgstat.c is hard-wired, meaning that if you
>>> have a configuration where "localhost" doesn't resolve correctly
>>> for whatever reason, there's no simple recourse to get the stats
>>> collector working. So ISTM there is an argument for changing that.
>
>> Well, hardcoding it will break the (unusual) case when localhost isn't
>> 127.0.0.1 / ::1. (You'd obviously have to have it try both ipv4 and
>> ipv6).
>
> You didn't read what I wrote before. Those numeric addresses define the
> loopback address, *not* "localhost". When localhost fails to resolve
> as those address(es), it's localhost that is wrong. We have actually
> seen this in the field with bogus DNS providers.
>
>> It's not common, but i've certainly come across a number of virtual
>> machines where localhost resolves (through /etc/hosts) to the machines
>> "real" IP rather than 127.0.01, because 127.0.0.1 simply doesn't
>> exist.
>
> That appears to me to be a broken (non RFC compliant) VM setup.
Can't argue with that. But it exists.
> However, maybe what this is telling us is we need to expose the setting?
> Or perhaps better, try 127.0.0.1, ::1, localhost, in that order.
That was kind of my point, that yes, we probably need to do one of
those at least. Today it is "kind of exposed", because you can edit
/etc/hosts - you don't need to rely on DNS for it. I just don't want
to lose that ability.
--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2010-10-06 13:49:00 | Re: host name support in pg_hba.conf |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-10-06 13:34:01 | Re: host name support in pg_hba.conf |