Re: Railroad diagrams, a-la sqlite

From: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Joseph Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Railroad diagrams, a-la sqlite
Date: 2010-07-17 20:36:20
Message-ID: AANLkTikLI4bnKUw0VTk48swJAAEJbs1jCIXBPSyBq3Az@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 17 July 2010 21:30, Joseph Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> On 7/17/10 1:26 PM, Thom Brown wrote:
>> On 17 July 2010 21:23, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 17, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>> While they're quite attractive, I actually see them being more
>>>> confusing than helpful personally, but I could be wrong.  I reckon
>>>> there might be clearer ways of representing statement options.  The
>>>> real problems with the railroad design come when there are lots of
>>>> references to other diagrams, and you end up with about 10 just for 1
>>>> statement.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a way of testing their usefulness?
>>>
>>> Personal experience? I used to find them quite useful when I was
>>> starting out with Informix.
>>>
>>
>> I guess I'm quite used to the existing statement definitions.  It's an
>> elegant idea, just wondering if it scales sanely.  Are the examples of
>> more complex statements?
>
> Oracle SELECT:
>
> http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/B14117_01/server.101/b10759/statements_10002.htm
>
> Joe
>

Yeah, that kinda chaotic. Looks like a sadistic puzzle from the
Krypton Factor. :S

Thom

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-07-17 20:42:53 Re: Railroad diagrams, a-la sqlite
Previous Message Joseph Conway 2010-07-17 20:30:48 Re: Railroad diagrams, a-la sqlite