| From: | zhong ming wu <mr(dot)z(dot)m(dot)wu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search |
| Date: | 2010-07-28 09:41:50 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikK1Mft93efVHDTf8p3DXW0JYVhE6pWr3Dsyt9G@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Howard Rogers <hjr(at)diznix(dot)com> wrote:
> Thanks to some very helpful input here in earlier threads, I was
> finally able to pull together a working prototype Full Text Search
> 'engine' on PostgreSQL and compare it directly to the way the
> production Oracle Text works. The good news is that PostgreSQL is
> bloody fast! The slightly iffy news is that the boss is now moaning
> about possible training costs!
>
> For what it's worth, I wrote up the performance comparison here:
> http://diznix.com/dizwell/archives/153
I always thought there is a clause in their user agreement preventing
the users from publishing benchmarks like that. I must be mistaken.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Williamson | 2010-07-28 10:02:59 | Re: Comparison of Oracle and PostgreSQL full text search |
| Previous Message | Sachin Srivastava | 2010-07-28 08:20:49 | Re: postgres-8.4SS, pg_dump from macosx-10.6 has "ssl handshake error" 26% in |