Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
To: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, pgadmin-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Subject: Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build
Date: 2011-01-19 09:12:45
Message-ID: AANLkTikJh7XGZD+SE=pwfnPJxkZT=0RSY9rUDUzd5gge@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgadmin-hackers

And hopefully Magnus will be able to help here too!

On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:25 PM, Peter Geoghegan
<peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Seems I omitted to copy my system's FlexLexer.h to
> ./pgadmin3/pgadmin/include/pgscript. Seemingly the FlexLexer.h that
> ships with pgadmin is for Flex 2.5.33 only. I have 2.5.35.
>
> However, I now get a slightly different set of compiler errors, so I'm
> not much better off.
>
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:944:10: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack’ was not declared
> in this scope
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:944:10: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack_top’ was not
> declared in this scope
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:945:27: error: ‘yyensure_buffer_stack’ was not
> declared in this scope
> pgscript/lex.pgs.cc:1858:8: error: ‘yy_buffer_stack’ was not declared
> in this scope
>
> ...and so on...
>
> Why do we ship a copy of FlexLexer.h from a specific version of
> flex++? Are we really that sensitive to the differences in Flex
> versions? Is the easiest thing to get pgadmin to build after changing
> the pgscript grammar to use flex 2.5.33, as perhaps suggested in
> ./pgadmin3/pgadmin/pgscript/README?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Peter Geoghegan
>

--
Dave Page
Blog: http://pgsnake.blogspot.com
Twitter: @pgsnake

EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgadmin-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2011-01-19 11:20:07 Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build
Previous Message Dave Page 2011-01-19 09:11:58 Re: wxWidgets 2.9 build