| From: | Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Sumit Pandya <sumit(dot)pandya(at)elitecore(dot)com>, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Interpretability with xDBC specification |
| Date: | 2010-07-06 14:27:13 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikIW1VcuXRQC4Yb5RX3ktEvqN41Az2EiRInfGXC@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-jdbc |
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 10:15 AM, Oliver Jowett <oliver(at)opencloud(dot)com> wrote:
> Sumit Pandya wrote:
>
>> Please excuse me if there is already such FAQ/White-Paper and in that
>> case share link.
>
> http://jdbc.postgresql.org/todo.html might be a start.
>
> If you'd like to prepare a compliance table yourself, I'm sure the list
> would be interested in the results. I should forewarn you, though, that
> the last time I checked, obtaining and setting up the JDBC CTS or TCK
> was a lot of work.
We actually got it to pass at one point when SUN was interested, and
they did most of the work.
Unfortunately you have to bend postgresql in ways it was never
intended to work to get it to pass.
Dave
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-07-06 15:03:43 | Re: Interpretability with xDBC specification |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2010-07-06 14:15:45 | Re: Interpretability with xDBC specification |