| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Laurent Wandrebeck <l(dot)wandrebeck(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marcin Krol <mrkafk(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Arkadiusz Rdest <a(dot)rdest(at)infomex(dot)pl> |
| Subject: | Re: Linux: PAE or x64 |
| Date: | 2010-12-15 11:40:39 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTikCe+MKmn+8tmEe0PZGnjHZ2Par7mz1WZeCyQbF@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 15 December 2010 10:37, Laurent Wandrebeck <l(dot)wandrebeck(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Don't even bother with PAE. Let it rot.
> memory consumption due to 64 bits pointers is negligible.
And yet, that has been used by authoritative people as a partial
justification for pg lacking a 64-bit version on Windows in the past
on more than one occasion. Perhaps it wasn't stressed too much, but
certainly it was treated as a greater than negligible issue:
http://blog.hagander.net/archives/73-PostgreSQL-vs-64-bit-windows.html
--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Filip Rembiałkowski | 2010-12-15 13:23:16 | Re: Changing WAL Directory in Postgres |
| Previous Message | tuanhoanganh | 2010-12-15 11:04:41 | Re: How to restore from backup to 8.4.3 server using 9.0 dump/restore |