Re: Per-column collation, work in progress

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Per-column collation, work in progress
Date: 2010-11-25 03:57:31
Message-ID: AANLkTik9wdgNvhEJfstc2gboza5KbMHq+WcA8tPCuGXj@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On tor, 2010-10-14 at 22:54 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> It seems you've falsified the header comment in
>> pathkeys_useful_for_merging(), although I guess it's already false
>> because it doesn't seem to have been updated for the NULLS ASC/DESC
>> stuff, and the interior comment in right_merge_direction() also needs
>> adjusting.  But this might be more than a documentation problem,
>> because the choice of merge direction really *is* arbitrary in the
>> case of ASC/DESC and NULLS FIRST/LAST, but I'm not sure whether that's
>> actually true for collation.  If collation affects the definition of
>> equality then it certainly isn't true.
>
> I did check that again and didn't arrive at the conclusion that the
> comments would need updating either with respect to this patch or some
> previous change.  Could you check again and possibly provide a
> suggestion?

I think that you are right and that my previous comment was erroneous.
Sorry for the noise.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Kupershmidt 2010-11-25 04:01:28 Re: Tab completion for view triggers in psql
Previous Message Daniel Farina 2010-11-25 03:37:14 Re: ALTER TABLE ... IF EXISTS feature?