Re: PostgreSQL and HugePage

From: Mark Wong <markwkm(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>
Cc: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL and HugePage
Date: 2010-10-21 15:16:27
Message-ID: AANLkTik9tbCHZFEHw-ttC2kfqooRXT3jyWUuRQnzq873@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 8:30 PM, daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 04:08:37PM +1300, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>> On 20/10/10 16:05, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> >shmget and friends are hugetlbpage  aware, so it seems it should 'just
>> >work'.
>> >
>>
>> Heh - provided you specify
>>
>> SHM_HUGETLB
>>
>>
>> in the relevant call that is :-)
>
> I had a patch for this against 8.3 that I could update if there is any
> interest. I suspect it is helpful.

Oh, probably better than me digging up my broken one. Send it out as
is if you don't want to update it. :)

Regards,
Mark

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-10-21 15:29:02 Re: Serializable snapshot isolation patch
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2010-10-21 15:12:02 Re: Extensions, this time with a patch