Re: upgrade

From: Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: upgrade
Date: 2011-02-03 19:05:34
Message-ID: AANLkTik9KvOQ3wb0E-J12GSCrgiYWHQqY7+08qoLdpyX@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 11:50 AM, Alan Hodgson <ahodgson(at)simkin(dot)ca> wrote:
> On February 2, 2011, "William Bruton" <drc(at)spidr(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> How do I know which version to upgrade to from 8.1.4?
>
>>
>
> Well, 8.1 is no longer supported, it seems. So an upgrade to any supported
> version will likely require application changes, or at least thorough
> testing. You might as well go right to 9.0.3 to get all the latest features.

While I agree that going to 9.0.latest makes the most sense, if this
is a sundowned system, and they just need to get on a supported
version for now, 8.2 is nearly a drop in replacement for 8.1. We went
from 8.1 to 8.2 to 8.3... The transition to 8.2 involved upgrading
and testing, and we had zero compatibility issues. 8.3 as a bit more
work. Anything after that's been cake.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-02-03 19:23:36 Re: isn't "insert into where not exists" atomic?
Previous Message Mage 2011-02-03 19:00:34 Re: isn't "insert into where not exists" atomic?