Re: multiset patch review

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: multiset patch review
Date: 2011-01-24 11:49:58
Message-ID: AANLkTik84=sWJNtUuZL0VrqdM-bATT1Cy=8fcZ=2wqga@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 2:45 AM, Itagaki Takahiro
<itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> [ latest patch ]

I notice that this is adding keywords and syntax support for what is
basically a PostgreSQL extension (since we certainly can't possibly be
following the SQL standards given that we're not implementing a new
datatype. Is that really a good idea?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Vangelis Katsikaros 2011-01-24 11:58:13 gist README
Previous Message Cédric Villemain 2011-01-24 11:30:40 Re: REVIEW: WIP: plpgsql - foreach in