Re: explaining "context" column of pg_settings

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: explaining "context" column of pg_settings
Date: 2011-03-11 17:40:36
Message-ID: AANLkTik1aAG6WUq=shPG1k9-e_tMCbYjhHgJkf-ysTzZ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:37 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
>> Robert Haas wrote:
>>> Please propose a specific patch so we can complain about it.  :-)
>
>> I am proposing Tom's:
>>       http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-docs/2010-12/msg00003.php

That's actually a link to Josh's message, not the one from Tom; I
assume you mean the patch in Tom's reply.

> It still seems like that material doesn't belong there.  However, it's
> largely a restatement of what's said in section 18.1 in a form that
> matches up with the presentation used in the pg_settings view.  Maybe
> it's okay to apply it as-is and just check to make sure that 18.1 is not
> missing any facts given here.

AFAICS 18.1 doesn't really contain a clear enumeration of all the
different settings types. We ought to have that somewhere.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-03-11 19:33:44 backward compatible
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-03-11 17:37:57 Re: explaining "context" column of pg_settings