On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 8:19 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> wrote:
>> * Oleg Bartunov (oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su) wrote:
>>> what do you need for documentation ? From users point of view we add just
>>> knn support and all examples are available in btree_gist.sql and sql
>>> subdirectory. Contact me directly, if you have questions.
>> It sure seems like
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.0/static/btree-gist.html could be and
>> should be improved, in general.. If this module is really still just a
>> test bed for GiST, then perhaps it's not a big deal..
> I agree that the documentation there could be a lot better, but I
> don't think that's a commit-blocker for this patch. However, "us
> reaching beta" will be a commit-blocker.
Teodor, are you intending to commit this? If so, it needs to be soon.
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2011-02-16 22:03:38|
|Subject: Re: contrib loose ends: 9.0 to 9.1 incompatibilities |
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-02-16 21:24:32|
|Subject: Re: Add support for logging the current role|
pgsql-rrreviewers by date
|Next:||From: Oleg Bartunov||Date: 2011-02-17 09:22:54|
|Subject: Re: btree_gist (was: CommitFest progress - or lack thereof)|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2011-02-16 15:36:53|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] reviewers needed!|