| From: | Sam Nelson <samn(at)consistentstate(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Checkpoint and Background Writer Statistics |
| Date: | 2011-02-22 22:49:57 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=koQMoMZFSNYPueYg4xbpN_RuAay9QQBzXiBTg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Err, sorry, I think I meant bgwriter_lru_maxpages, not lru_max_dirty.
---
===========================
Samuel Nelson
Consistent State
www.consistentstate.com
303-955-0509
===========================
On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Sam Nelson <samn(at)consistentstate(dot)com>wrote:
> Hi, list.
>
> We're trying to pull a few various metrics from the postgres catalogs to
> analyze database performance, and included is buffers_checkpoint and
> buffers_clean from pg_stat_bgwriter.
>
> One of our clients has an lru_max_dirty setting of 1000 and a
> bgwriter_delay of 200, but we're still seeing much higher growth in the
> buffers_checkpoint than buffers_clean, with buffers_checkpoint increasing at
> about 20 times the rate that buffers_clean is. We don't see very much
> growth in the maxwritten_clean, though - something like one every couple of
> days.
>
> So the questions is, why are there still so many more checkpoint buffers
> than clean buffers written? Does the buffers_checkpoint value include more
> than we think? If not, can we tune things further?
>
> ---
> ===========================
> Samuel Nelson
> Consistent State
> www.consistentstate.com
> 303-955-0509
> ===========================
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-02-22 22:51:28 | Re: ssl connection problem |
| Previous Message | Sam Nelson | 2011-02-22 22:42:07 | Checkpoint and Background Writer Statistics |