Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CVS in docs

From: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CVS in docs
Date: 2010-09-22 14:10:13
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
On 22 September 2010 15:07, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:46, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing
>>>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning
>>>> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching.
>>> Agreed.
>>> What about the messages in configure?
>>> "configure:*** Without Bison you will not be able to build PostgreSQL
>>> from CVS nor"
>> I was lumping those in the "not worth back-patching" category, but
>> if you're excited about them, feel free to back-patch.
> Ok. I'll see - I need to get an old version of autoconf going too - I
> somehow managed to wipe the one I have, and Ubuntu ships with a
> different version :-)
> I take the lack of comment on the patch itself as silent approval, so
> I'll go look at backporting it soon.

I don't see any mention of redirecting the Heap-Only Tuples glossary
reference link.  Is that staying as it is?

Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-09-22 14:20:13
Subject: Re: CVS in docs
Previous:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-09-22 14:07:22
Subject: Re: CVS in docs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group