Re: CVS in docs

On 22 September 2010 15:07, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:46, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing
>>>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning
>>>> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching.
>>
>>> Agreed.
>>
>>> What about the messages in configure?
>>> "configure:*** Without Bison you will not be able to build PostgreSQL
>>> from CVS nor"
>>
>> I was lumping those in the "not worth back-patching" category, but
>> if you're excited about them, feel free to back-patch.
>
> Ok. I'll see - I need to get an old version of autoconf going too - I
> somehow managed to wipe the one I have, and Ubuntu ships with a
> different version :-)
>
> I take the lack of comment on the patch itself as silent approval, so
> I'll go look at backporting it soon.

I don't see any mention of redirecting the Heap-Only Tuples glossary
reference link. Is that staying as it is?

--
Thom Brown
Twitter: @darkixion
IRC (freenode): dark_ixion
Registered Linux user: #516935