| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, fazool mein <fazoolmein(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry |
| Date: | 2010-09-02 12:59:28 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=Lg-dRkavA-FMP_KWHAq7kMqt28hX-V6HWZsi0@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> "All standbys" has no meaning without registration. It is not a question
> that needs an answer.
Tell that to the DBA. I bet s/he knows what "all standbys" means.
The fact that the system doesn't know something doesn't make it
unimportant.
I agree that we don't absolutely need standby registration for some
really basic version of synchronous replication. But I think we'd be
better off biting the bullet and adding it. I think that without it
we're going to resort to a series of increasingly grotty and
user-unfriendly hacks to make this work.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2010-09-02 13:02:18 | Re: git: uh-oh |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-09-02 12:44:27 | Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry |