Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, fazool mein <fazoolmein(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Date: 2010-09-02 12:59:28
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> "All standbys" has no meaning without registration. It is not a question
> that needs an answer.

Tell that to the DBA.  I bet s/he knows what "all standbys" means.
The fact that the system doesn't know something doesn't make it

I agree that we don't absolutely need standby registration for some
really basic version of synchronous replication.  But I think we'd be
better off biting the bullet and adding it.  I think that without it
we're going to resort to a series of increasingly grotty and
user-unfriendly hacks to make this work.

Robert Haas
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-09-02 13:02:18
Subject: Re: git: uh-oh
Previous:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2010-09-02 12:44:27
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group