Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CVS in docs

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: CVS in docs
Date: 2010-09-22 14:07:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 15:46, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 00:38, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> A quick grep suggests that there are a dozen or two other passing
>>> references to CVS in docs and comments, which'd be worth cleaning
>>> up in HEAD, but probably not worth back-patching.
>> Agreed.
>> What about the messages in configure?
>> "configure:*** Without Bison you will not be able to build PostgreSQL
>> from CVS nor"
> I was lumping those in the "not worth back-patching" category, but
> if you're excited about them, feel free to back-patch.

Ok. I'll see - I need to get an old version of autoconf going too - I
somehow managed to wipe the one I have, and Ubuntu ships with a
different version :-)

I take the lack of comment on the patch itself as silent approval, so
I'll go look at backporting it soon.

 Magnus Hagander

In response to


pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Thom BrownDate: 2010-09-22 14:10:13
Subject: Re: CVS in docs
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-09-22 13:46:46
Subject: Re: CVS in docs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group