From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Set hint bits upon eviction from BufMgr |
Date: | 2011-03-28 14:09:57 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=wpoenKQQFFQ5wfBJXbL++YrMui75EvEjKU7ti@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I'd like to experiment on this and see what comes out.
Great!
> If the
> bgwriter was to be granted the ability to inspect buffers and set
> hints, it needs to be able to peek in and inspect the buffer itself
> which it currently doesn't do FWICT.
That matches my understanding.
> I was thinking about setting a
> flag in the buffer (BM_HEAP) that gets set by the loader which flags
> the buffer for later inspection. Is there a simpler way to do this?
Hmm. That's slightly crufty, but it might be OK. At least, I don't
have a better idea.
> I think you guys are correct: the logic belongs in the bgwriter.
> Generally speaking, it looks like the best route to minimizing hint
> bit pain is to if at all possible write them out set so they don't
> have to be rewritten later (Stephen's approach to leverage in
> transaction table creation is another way of attempting to do that).
Yeah.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2011-03-28 14:11:31 | Re: Additional options for Sync Replication |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-28 14:04:36 | Re: alpha5 |