| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: array_agg() NULL Handling |
| Date: | 2010-09-01 18:27:42 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=vAhu6Q+579pXWaXe-6qyXvTA0+F7t3UA447MU@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2010/9/1 Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
> "David E. Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> writes:
>> On Sep 1, 2010, at 11:09 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>>> Then you can eliminate NULLs with simple function
>
>> Kind of defeats the purpose of the efficiency of the aggregate.
>
> Well, you can build your own version of array_agg with the same
> implementation, except you mark the transition function as strict ...
>
I am checking this now, and it is not possible - it needs a some
initial value and there isn't possible to set a "internal" value.
probably some C coding is necessary.
Regards
Pavel
> regards, tom lane
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2010-09-01 18:32:50 | compiling with RELCACHE_FORCE_RELEASE doesn't pass regression |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-09-01 18:25:51 | Re: array_agg() NULL Handling |