Re: The first dedicated PostgreSQL forum

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)sbcglobal(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The first dedicated PostgreSQL forum
Date: 2010-11-15 20:06:59
Message-ID: AANLkTi=tvNgaiJ-DeraD_kft5OVdcLiWidF2yAcbOxGB@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 02:01, Dennis Gearon <gearond(at)sbcglobal(dot)net> wrote:
> One thing that makes me agree with this is the antiquated format of the digest
> emails.

I agree - I thought nobody used that anymore :-)

> I hate google mail, but I love the google groups application. If postgres had a
> combination online forum/google groups thing (if there is such a thing),
> communication would be much improved.

Personally, I hate the google groups format. But that's beside the
point here - I do realize that others prefer it.

I do think that the PostgreSQL lists are available there. And other
than that, they are on markmail.org, Nabble, etc. AFAIK several of
those allow both reading and posting. Is there actually something
about these interfaces that people find *missing*, or can we easily
solve this whole thing by more clearly telling people that these
options exist?

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Richard Broersma 2010-11-15 20:07:46 Re: The first dedicated PostgreSQL forum
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-11-15 20:02:20 Re: The first dedicated PostgreSQL forum