From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Alpha4 release blockers (was Re: wrapping up this CommitFest) |
Date: | 2011-03-05 18:27:49 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTi=tfFOODcOi4rKHprTSCrgEhHQspBhiqjAOeoHg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 10:33 AM, Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> wrote:
> On 03/05/2011 08:54 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:44 AM, Andy Colson<andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Support unlogged tables. The contents of an unlogged table are
>>>> WAL-logged;
>>>
>>> um.. are _not_ WAL-logged?
>>
>> Uh, yeah. It looks like I fixed that in the version I committed, but
>> introduced another, similar mistake which I have now also fixed.
>>
>
> Improved support for parallel make, make -k, and make -q
>
> Can we add a line saying "-j still doesnt work, dont use it yet" or "make
> -j2 works great now". I admit I've never tried to use -j before... is this
> telling me its ok to use now?
I've been using -j3 for a long time. These changes just make it able
to parallelize a bit better. As Peter says, -j without arguments is
mostly just a footgun. I can't imagine why that option hasn't been
removed long since.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-03-05 18:48:20 | Re: Extensions vs. shared procedural language handler functions |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-03-05 18:23:42 | Re: Replication server timeout patch |