Re: system views for walsender activity

From: Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: system views for walsender activity
Date: 2010-12-28 13:14:19
Message-ID: AANLkTi=tKMj_z8tktOW1k-HxFMwy6-ryecENyeQEjuwa@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 21:46, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
>> Unfortunately, 2 also requires initdb because pg_stat_activity will
>> use LEFT JOIN instead of normal JOIN not to hide rows with databaseid = 0.
>> All of them are items for 9.1.
>
> Did this one end up on the floor?
>
> We definitely need the very basic level for 9.1, and we can always
> improve on it later :-) Do you want to keep working on it, or do you
> want me to pick it up?

OK, I'll work for it.

> I'm not sure it makes much sense to add walsenders to pg_stat_activity
> - a lot of the fields would no longer make any sense (statement start?
> query start?) - I think we're better off with a separate view for
> pg_stat_walsender. It would then only need the columns for procpid,
> usesysid, usename, client_addr, client_port, and the WALsender
> specific fields.

+1 for the separate view. "backend_start" (or replication_start?)
might be also reasonable.

--
Itagaki Takahiro

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-12-28 13:14:46 Re: "writable CTEs"
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-12-28 12:49:06 Function for dealing with xlog data