| From: | Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: string function - "format" function proposal |
| Date: | 2010-10-14 02:03:16 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=fnttO4dGsjHWJd7V5YMPpBuqahO0gFmTx4b4q@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 10:23 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:59 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> [ updated patch, in response to a review from Itagaki Takahiro ]
>
> This patch appears to be waiting for a second round of review.
> Itagaki-san, are you planning to do that?
I can, but I was waiting for other people's comments about the design:
- format() in core, that implements %s, %i, and %l.
- substitute() for $n format and sprintf() that partially implements
the same function in C in contrib/stringfunc.
I don't like having three similar functions for the same purpose,
but Pavel said they are the best solutions. What will be our consensus?
--
Itagaki Takahiro
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2010-10-14 02:10:14 | Re: How to reliably detect if it's a promoting standby |
| Previous Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-10-14 01:44:50 | Re: rollback to savepoint leads to transaction already in progress |