Re: a new problem in MERGE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Boxuan Zhai <bxzhai2010(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: a new problem in MERGE
Date: 2010-11-21 20:37:53
Message-ID: AANLkTi=fFX+-887YSM4ywYhmhVnQo0uZkHs5Uq6sFTST@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 2:41 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Boxuan Zhai wrote:
>>
>> I have plan to fix the above two bugs together. (in fact, I have already
>> started coding in merge_v202 edition). My question is how should I make my
>> update be consistent with yours. Is it possible for you to give me an
>> edition that I can work on?
>
> I just got this reconciled with HEAD again.  There have been two changes I
> made in the code you'll eventually want in your working copy:

Boxuan, are you still working on this patch?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2010-11-21 21:05:07 Re: Tab completion for view triggers in psql
Previous Message Robert Haas 2010-11-21 20:36:58 Re: Tab completion for view triggers in psql