| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Srini Raghavan <sixersrini(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Database file copy |
| Date: | 2011-01-14 20:36:02 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=cj4ZJf884U7oSFhUu6zrBEgkbzNG_2aavmWbF@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>> If we're going to be supporting that long term, we should probably
>> change the note about FREEZE being deprecated, though.
>
>> So, still +1 on removing the wording about FREEZE being deprecated,
>> but instead we should mention what actually *is* deprecated (the
>> omission of the parentheses).
>
> If we're going to do that, we should deprecate the unparenthesized
> syntax altogether, with an eye to de-reserving VERBOSE and ANALYZE
> as well.
I'm not wildly enthusiastic about breaking this with only one
intervening release. We normally support deprecated syntax for quite
a bit longer than that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-01-14 20:41:13 | Re: Database file copy |
| Previous Message | Jan Urbański | 2011-01-14 20:29:39 | Re: Wildcard search support for pg_trgm |