| From: | Fabrízio de Royes Mello <fabriziomello(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Running PostgreSQL as fast as possible no matter the consequences |
| Date: | 2011-01-19 17:27:30 |
| Message-ID: | AANLkTi=bmBYvhNU4oxYDsUCkY6rTJdwxwG_hfbCtR4Av@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
2011/1/19 Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
>
> FYI, we do have a documentation section about how to configure Postgres
> for improved performance if you don't care about durability:
>
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/non-durability.html
>
A sometime ago I wrote in my blog [1] (sorry but available only in
pt-br) how to create an in-memory database with PostgreSQL. This little
article is based on post of Mr. Robert Haas about this topic [2].
[1]
http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com/2010/06/postgresql-na-memoria-ram-in-memory.html
[2]
http://rhaas.blogspot.com/2010/06/postgresql-as-in-memory-only-database_24.html
--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2011-01-19 18:06:58 | Re: the XID question |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-01-19 17:26:56 | Re: "NOT IN" substantially slower in 9.0.2 than 8.3.13 - NOT EXISTS runs fast in both 8.3.13 and 9.0.2 |