Re: knngist - 0.8

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, Pgsql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: knngist - 0.8
Date: 2010-10-15 21:35:17
Message-ID: AANLkTi=Xw6PDg-rp_O+yksQQoSjTjRLHrLzoDm=pegRy@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 12:02 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> BTW, have we discussed the idea of embedding the role in the strategy
> number?  For example, require regular operators to have strategy
> numbers 1-9999, while ordering operators have numbers 10000-19999,
> leaving room for a couple more roles before we have to rethink the
> assignment or widen amopstrategy to an int.  That's a bit ugly but
> might be better than adding a separate role column.

Yeah, we talked about it.

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg01075.php
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2010-02/msg01079.php

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-10-15 21:42:41 Re: string function - "format" function proposal
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-10-15 21:32:13 Re: Git migration deadline for Buildfarm