Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, fazool mein <fazoolmein(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Synchronous replication - patch status inquiry
Date: 2010-09-07 18:27:36
Message-ID: AANLkTi=POP29wmduo75px7Vq4ZXNHT52suVF+Mx97h3U@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Every time I explain anything, I get someone run around shouting "but
> that can't work!". I'm sorry, but again your logic is poor and the bias
> against properly considering viable alternatives is the only thing
> perfectly evident. So yes, I agree, it is a waste of time discussing it
> until I show working code.

Obviously you don't "agree", because that's the exact opposite of what
I just said.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-09-07 18:31:14 Re: can we publish a aset interface?
Previous Message Max Bowsher 2010-09-07 18:25:41 Re: git: uh-oh