Re: Default mode for shutdown

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Default mode for shutdown
Date: 2010-12-15 22:59:48
Message-ID: AANLkTi=EBCRbWnOY1NZcfZ7b+KsJqtQ-9oxFZc23qsm+@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 16:11, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié dic 15 12:03:06 -0300 2010:
>
>> Certainly, if you have an environment where people are mostly logging
>> into the database directly (not through a connection pooler) and they
>> do a few important queries and then disconnect, smart is a better
>> default.  But if you have an environment where (for whatever reason)
>> long-lasting connections are common, smart is worse than useless.
>
> It occurs to me that we may need a new mode, which disconnects sessions
> that are not in a transaction (or as soon as they are) but leaves
> in-progress transactions alone; this could be the new default.  Of
> course, this is much more difficult to implement than the current modes.

Now that, however, would actually be a useful behavior... Where's your patch? ;)

--
 Magnus Hagander
 Me: http://www.hagander.net/
 Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-12-15 23:00:03 Re: range intervals in window function frames
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-12-15 22:56:15 Re: Default mode for shutdown