Re: refactoring comment.c

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kevin(dot)grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: refactoring comment.c
Date: 2010-08-28 02:42:12
Message-ID: AANLkTi=8+x0+9xfMV6aM3_uTQn_zWaVtBxLEE7hm3euS@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 9:49 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> What's a bit odd about this is that I do get warnings for this kind of
>> thing in general, which get turned into errors since I compile with
>> -Werror; and in fact the version of the patch that I committed has no
>> fewer than four places where there is a comment that says "placate
>> compiler".  But for some reason the compiler I used to develop this
>> patch (gcc-4.2.1 i686-apple-darwin10) did not complain about this
>> case, for reasons that are not quite clear to me.
>
> gcc has been able to detect possibly-uninitialized scalar variables
> for many years, but only fairly-recent versions seem to apply the
> same type of logic to fields of local structs.

I thought it might be something like that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Postgres Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tomas 2010-08-28 07:02:37 Re: git: uh-oh
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-08-28 01:49:28 Re: refactoring comment.c